ArticleJournal of medical genetics1995
Detecting deletions in the critical region for lissencephaly on 17p13.3 using fluorescent in situ hybridisation and a PCR assay identifying a dinucleotide repeat polymorphism.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple occurrence of psychomotor retardation and recurrent miscarriages in a family with a submicroscopic reciprocal translocation t(7;17)(p22;p13.2).BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- Neurodevelopmental Genetic Diseases Associated With Microdeletions and Microduplications of Chromosome 17p13.3.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Chromosome breakage hotspots and delineation of the critical region for the 9p-deletion syndrome.American journal of human genetics · 1999Article
- Syndromes with lissencephaly.Journal of medical genetics · 1996Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During a study of lissencephaly in England and Wales, 23 children were identified with this diagnosis. They were classified as follows: three children had Miller-Dieker syndrome (MDS), 13 had isolated lissencephaly sequence (ILS), two had type II lissencephaly, and five children were reclassified as focal or diffuse cortical dysplasia. Microdeletions of chromosome 17p13.3, also known as the Miller-Dieker critical region, have been associated with both MDS and ILS. We used the commercially available Oncor probe for fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) studies on 14 patients and a further four were studied elsewhere. Deletions were identified in all three MDS patients and two of the ILS patients. These results are consistent with previously reported data. No deletions were found in those patients with focal or diffuse cortical dysplasia. In addition, a CA repeat polymorphism which maps to the Miller-Dieker critical region was studied in 12 families and was informative in nine; the results were consistent with the FISH data. We conclude that FISH is a reliable method to detect deletions in patients with MDS and ILS and also useful to identify chromosome rearrangements in their parents which are not detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis. The PCR assay, if informative, is also reliable and a useful alternative if only DNA is available. None of the five children with atypical radiological features had a deletion. We therefore suggest that as well as looking for other aetiologies a careful review of the diagnosis should be made of the MDS or ILS cases in whom a deletion is not found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.