ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology1994
Action of lead on glutamate-activated chloride currents in Helix pomatia L. neurons.
Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of inorganic and organic tin compounds on ACh- and voltage-activated Na currents.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2000Article
- The neurotoxicity of environmental pollutants: the effects of tin (Sn2+) on acetylcholine-induced currents in greater pond snail neurons.Neuroscience and behavioral physiologyArticle
- NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists selectively affect the synaptic mechanisms of nociceptive sensitization in snails.Neuroscience and behavioral physiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. In molluscan neurons glutamate may, on different neurons, evoke either excitation or inhibition. We studied neurons of Helix pomatia which have hyperpolarizing responses to glutamate and determined the effects of lead on these responses. 2. In voltage clamp experiments, the reversal potentials of these glutamate responses indicate that they are due to a conductance increase to chloride ions. Further evidence for this conclusion was obtained by the demonstration that responses to glutamate remained unaffected in experiments with intracellular dialysis with K-free saline in the presence of Na- and K-free extracellular media. In these circumstances, there is effectively no other ion than chloride to carry the current. In isolated neurons the glutamate-evoked chloride current is concentration dependent between 25 and 2500 microM. The current rises over 200 msec and declines in the continued presence of glutamate over a period of about 3 sec. 3. Lead (0.5-1.0 microM) potentiated the glutamate-evoked chloride current provided that the channels were not maximally activated. The potentiation was greater if lead was added 30-60 sec before glutamate application. 4. These results suggest that potentiation of transmitter-evoked responses by lead must be considered as yet another possible site of action of lead on neurons, and thus this effect must be considered as a part of the mechanism responsible for the neurotoxicity of this heavy metal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.