Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7641234›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology1994

Action of lead on glutamate-activated chloride currents in Helix pomatia L. neurons.

J Salánki, J Györi, D O Carpenter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J SalánkiBalaton Limnological Research Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Tihany.
J Györi
D O Carpenter
Hungarian Academy of Sciences · HUNew York State Department of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. In molluscan neurons glutamate may, on different neurons, evoke either excitation or inhibition. We studied neurons of Helix pomatia which have hyperpolarizing responses to glutamate and determined the effects of lead on these responses. 2. In voltage clamp experiments, the reversal potentials of these glutamate responses indicate that they are due to a conductance increase to chloride ions. Further evidence for this conclusion was obtained by the demonstration that responses to glutamate remained unaffected in experiments with intracellular dialysis with K-free saline in the presence of Na- and K-free extracellular media. In these circumstances, there is effectively no other ion than chloride to carry the current. In isolated neurons the glutamate-evoked chloride current is concentration dependent between 25 and 2500 microM. The current rises over 200 msec and declines in the continued presence of glutamate over a period of about 3 sec. 3. Lead (0.5-1.0 microM) potentiated the glutamate-evoked chloride current provided that the channels were not maximally activated. The potentiation was greater if lead was added 30-60 sec before glutamate application. 4. These results suggest that potentiation of transmitter-evoked responses by lead must be considered as yet another possible site of action of lead on neurons, and thus this effect must be considered as a part of the mechanism responsible for the neurotoxicity of this heavy metal.

Indexed as

AnimalsChloride ChannelsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEvoked PotentialsGanglia, InvertebrateGlutamic AcidHelix, SnailsIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsLeadMembrane PotentialsNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesTime FactorsChloride ChannelsGlutamic AcidLead

Identifiers

PMID7641234
PMCPMC11566774
OpenAlexW2039658112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.