ArticleJournal of bacteriology1995
Amino acid efflux in response to chemotactic and osmotic signals in Bacillus subtilis.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological Features and Cold-Response Gene Expression in MesophilicMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes duringFrontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- RBC deformability and amino acid concentrations after hypo-osmotic challenge may reflect chronic cell hydration status in healthy young men.Physiological reports · 2013Article
- Time-course analysis of the Shewanella amazonensis SB2B proteome in response to sodium chloride shock.Scientific reports · 2011Article
- Osmosensing by bacteria: signals and membrane-based sensors.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 1999Review
- Glycerol elicits energy taxis of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium.Journal of bacteriology · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We observed a large efflux of nonvolatile radioactivity from Bacillus subtilis in response to the addition of 31 mM butyrate or the withdrawal of 0.1 M aspartate in a flow assay. The major nonvolatile components effluxed were methionine, proline, histidine, and lysine. In studies of the release of volatile radioactivity in chemotaxis by B. subtilis cells that had been labeled with [3H]methionine, the breakdown of methionine to methanethiol can contribute substantially to the volatile radioactivity in fractions following addition of 0.1 M aspartate. However, methanol was confirmed to be released after aspartate addition and, in lesser quantities, after aspartate withdrawal. Methanol and methanethiol were positively identified by derivitization with 3,5-dinitro-benzoylchloride. Amino acid efflux but not methanol release was observed in response to 0.1 M aspartate stimulation of a cheR mutant of B. subtilis that lacks the chemotaxis methylesterase. The amino acid efflux could be reproduced by withdrawal of 0.1 M NaCl, 0.2 M sucrose, or 0.2 M xylitol and is probably the result of changes in osmolarity. Chemotaxis to 10 mM alanine or 10 mM proline resulted in methanol release but not efflux of amino acids. In behavioral studies, B. subtilis tumbled for 16 to 18 s in response to a 200 mosM upshift and for 14 s after a 20 mosM downshift in osmolarity when the bacteria were in perfusion buffer (40 mosM). The pattern of methanol release was similar to that observed in chemotaxis. This is consistent with osmotaxis in B. subtilis away from an increase or decrease in the osmolarity of the incubation medium. The release of methanol suggests that osmotaxis is correlated with methylation of a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.