ArticleHuman genetics1995
Amplifying dinucleotide microsatellite loci from bone and tooth samples of up to 5000 years of age: more inconsistency than usefulness.
Article in Human genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microevolution and mega-icebergs in the Antarctic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have studied the feasibility of using dinucleotide-repeat microsatellites in the analysis of DNA from ancient bones and teeth. We have used three microsatellites (IVS8CA, IVS17BTA, and IVS17BCA) within the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene in 28 DNA samples from bones and teeth of up to 5000 years of age. PCR amplification was successful in 71.4% of cases. The repeated analysis of each marker produced different genotypes in 97% of samples, and the same individual genotype was reproduced at least once in 45.5% of cases. Alleles differing from the originals consisted of additions or deletions of 1-39 dinucleotides. The mechanism by which alleles differing from the originals were amplified can be related to the marked degradation of the DNA, with repeat sequences of different length interacting with the partially degraded repeats of the amplified loci. The repeated analysis of each sample allowed us to produce data with some anthropological interest. Among the haptotypes detected in samples from Easter Island, two (16-32-13 and 23-32-13) were found in more than one sample. Similarly, three haplotypes (16-7-17, 16-7-13, and 16-24-13) were detected more than once in samples from the Basque Country. Although haplotypes in the Basque Country are amongst the commonest in European chromosomes, most of those detected in the Easter Island samples are not frequent in Europeans. Thus, the repeated typing of microsatellites allowed us to postulate the genotypes that might be present in the samples but dinucleotide markers do not seem to be reliable enough for genotyping ancient bone and teeth samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.