ArticleHuman genetics1995
The mutational demography of protein C deficiency.
Article in Human genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cladistic structure within the human Lipoprotein lipase gene and its implications for phenotypic association studies.Genetics · 2000Article
- Recombinational and mutational hotspots within the human lipoprotein lipase gene.American journal of human genetics · 2000Article
- Protein C deficiency: summary of the 1995 database update.Nucleic acids research · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The geographical distribution and prevalence of 256 single base-pair substitutions (105 of them being different) within the coding region of the human protein C (PROC) gene were correlated with their initial likelihoods of generation. A significant positive correlation was observed between these "mutational likelihoods" and the geographical dispersal of the PROC gene lesions within and between 16 different countries. This relationship could be attributed to the fact that, with few exceptions, high dispersal was only exhibited by CG-->TG and CG-->CA transitions, i.e. those substitutions that are known to arise de novo at the highest frequency. The statistical distribution of mutational likelihoods was as predicted on the basis of the PROC cDNA sequence alone, allowing however for the redundancy of the genetic code. These findings suggest (1) that genetic drift and lesion-specific selection have been of relatively minor importance in determining the mutational spectrum observed in the PROC gene and (2) that most multiple reports of particular substitutions in different geographical locations appear to reflect recurrent mutation rather than identity-by-descent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.