ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering
Kinetics of cell detachment: effect of ligand density.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2014Review
- Isotopic tracing for calculating the surface density of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-containing peptide on allogeneic bone.Orthopaedic surgery · 2013Article
- Detachment of affinity-captured bioparticles by elastic deformation of a macroporous hydrogel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006Article
- Effect of receptor-ligand affinity on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion.Biophysical journal · 1996Article
- Modeling cell migration in 3D: Status and challenges.Cell adhesion & migrationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell adhesion to substratum is often mediated by binding between cell surface receptors and substrate ligands. Substrates can be derivatized with different types and densities of ligands, but how substrate chemistry determines cellular function, such as adhesion strength, has not been demonstrated quantitatively. We employ a numerical methodology developed by Dembo and colleagues (9), who investigated membrane peeling under conditions of excess ligand density, to investigate the kinetics and strength of cell peeling from ligand coated surfaces for arbitrary ligand density. We show there are two asymptotic limits to peeling strength, as quantified by the critical tension: a high ligand density limit, where the critical tension is independent of ligand density and depends logarithmically on the receptor density; and a low ligand density limit, in which the critical tension depends logarithmically on the ligand density but is independent of receptor density. In between these limits, we numerically determine the critical tension. The critical tension is always a weak function of the dissociation constant between ligand and receptor. Furthermore, we show how the rate of peeling, for tensions above the critical tension, depends on ligand density and the mechanical properties of the receptor-ligand bonds. Interestingly, we illustrate when small increases in ligand density should alter cellular behavior, inducing a change to spreading onto a substrate from peeling up from a substrate. In total the predictions of this paper provide criteria for the design of ligand-coated substrate that provide for the proper adhesion strength and dynamics of detachment of cells from surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7631985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.