Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7631981›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering

Time series characterization of simulated microtubule dynamics in the nerve growth cone.

D J Odde, H M Buettner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D J OddeDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855-0909, USA.
H M Buettner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of neurite outgrowth is critically dependent on proper microtubule assembly. However, characterizing the dynamics of microtubule assembly and their quantitative relationship to neurite outgrowth is a difficult task. The difficulty can be reduced by using time series analysis which has broad application in characterizing the dynamics of stochastic, or "noisy," behaviors. Here we apply time series analysis to quantitatively compare simulated microtubule assembly and neurite outgrowth in vitro. Microtubule length life histories were simulated assuming constant growth and shrinkage rates coupled with random selection of growth and shrinkage times, a formulation based on the dynamic instability model of microtubule assembly. Net length displacements of simulated microtubules were calculated at discrete, evenly spaced times, and the resulting time series were characterized by both spectral and autocorrelation analysis. Depending on the sampling rate and the dynamic parameters, simulated microtubules exhibited significant autocorrelation and periodicity. To make a comparison to neurite outgrowth, we characterized the dynamic behavior of simulated microtubule populations and found it was not significantly different from that of single microtubules. The net displacements of rat superior cervical ganglion neurite tips were measured and characterized using time series methods. Their behavior was consistent with the microtubule dynamics for appropriate simulation parameters and sampling rates. Our results show that time series analysis can provide a useful tool for quantitative characterization of microtubule dynamics and neurite outgrowth and for assessing the relationship between them.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DivisionCells, CulturedComputer SimulationHumansMicrotubulesModels, TheoreticalNeuronsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID7631981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.