Trial reportJournal of clinical pathology1995
Plasma cell proliferation in monoclonal gammopathies: measurement using BU-1 antibody in flow cytometry and microscopy: comparison with serum thymidine kinase.
Trial report in Journal of clinical pathology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe labelling index as defined by the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells doubling their DNA in the S phase is a useful prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. The aim of this study was to examine the specificity and sensitivity of a new flow cytometric method for measuring the labelling index.
methodsBone marrow specimens from five patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and 61 patients with multiple myeloma were investigated. The labelling index (LI%) was determined by means of a microscopic and flow cytometric method using the antibromodeoxyuridine antibody BU-1. Serum thymidine kinase, another index of proliferation, was measured by radioimmunoassay.
resultsGood comparability (r = 0.83) and nearly equal imprecision (CV < 20%) were found with microscopic and flow cytometric methods of LI% measurement. However, 1000 or more cells had to be counted by microscopy around the cutoff value to avoid an unacceptable imprecision. Plasma cells with increased S phase (LI% > 1%) were characterised by their reduced light chain fluorescence intensity ratio between plasma cells and nonspecifically stained cells (7.9 v 14.8, p < 0.002), that is, by their generally lowered cytoplasmic immunoglobulin content. There was a moderate correlation between thymidine kinase and labelling index (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). At 100% specificity, myelomas with proliferating plasma cells were more sensitively detected by the labelling index than by serum thymidine kinase (55% v 32% sensitivity).
conclusionsThe labelling index represents a more specific and sensitive proliferation marker than serum thymidine kinase. Flow cytometry does not result in greater precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.