ArticleAmerican journal of public health1995
Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.
Article in American journal of public health, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can researchers trust ICD-10 coding of medical comorbidities in orthopaedic trauma patients?OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2024Article
- Making the cut on caesarean section: a logistic regression analysis on factors favouring caesarean sections without medical indication in comparison to spontaneous vaginal birth.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Obstetric consequences of a false-positive diagnosis of large-for-gestational-age fetus.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022Article
- Term Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk among Obese Women with and without Comorbidities.American journal of perinatology · 2022Article
- Hospitalization Duration Following Uncomplicated Cesarean Delivery: Predictors, Facility Variation, and Outcomes.AJP reports · 2020Article
- Timing of delivery in women with diabetes: A population-based study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2020Article
- Elucidating the role of overweight and obesity in racial and ethnic disparities in cesarean delivery risk.Annals of epidemiology · 2020Article
- Low risk pregnancies after a cesarean section: Determinants of trial of labor and its failure.PloS one · 2020Article
- Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2019Article
- Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2018Article
- Labor induction and cesarean delivery: A prospective cohort study of first births in Pennsylvania, USA.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2017Article
- Brief Report: Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Fecundability.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2016Article
- The Effect of Clinical Chorioamnionitis on Cesarean Delivery in the United States.Health services research · 2016Article
- Factors associated with increased cesarean risk among African American women: evidence from California, 2010.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- The utility of ICD9-CM codes in identifying induction of labor.American journal of perinatology · 2015Article
- Comparison of medical issues in antenatal and perinatal periods in early youth, adolescent, and young adult mothers in Taiwan: a 10-year nationwide study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2014Article
- First birth Caesarean section and subsequent fertility: a population-based study in the USA, 2000-2008.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.Maternal and child health journal · 2013Article
- Practice variation, bias, and experiential learning in cesarean delivery: a data-based system dynamics approach.Health services research · 2013Article
- The impact of health information technology adoption by outpatient facilities on pregnancy outcomes.Health services research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aggregate databases are increasingly being used to evaluate appropriateness of care, and, for cesarean sections, Anderson and Lomas' International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), coding hierarchy is a widely used tool. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the hierarchy and expand its applicability to repeat cesareans. Hospital records of 1885 singleton cesareans were reviewed. Clinical indications and ICD-9 hierarchical codes were concordant for 83% of primary and 86% of repeat cesareans; modification allowed elective repeat cesareans to be distinguished from indicated procedures. The Anderson and Lomas ICD-9 hierarchy is a valid tool for assessing indications for cesarean. The current modification improves its clinical utility and expands its application to repeat procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.