Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7624393›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews1995

Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction.

P F Davies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 793 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
793citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

793 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Loss of cerebral autoregulation drives abnormal perfusion patterns after stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Hemodynamic Metrics and Arterial Dysfunction: Insights From a Novel Microfluidic Device.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Endothelial Elavl1 Fine-Tunes Immune Responses in Atherosclerosis.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

733 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P F DaviesDepartment of Pathology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF CELL COMMUNICATION/ATHEROGENESISR37HL036049 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIES, PETER FRANCIS · 1993 to 2002
$816k
THE MOLECULAR ANATOMY/FUNCTION OF APOLIPOPROTEIN E IN GONAD STEROIDOGENIC CELLSP50HL015062 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MAZZONE, THEODORE · 1985 to 1996
–
STUDIES ON ENDOTHELIUM IN RELATION TO ATHEROGENESISR01HL036049 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DAVIES, PETER FRANCIS · 1985 to 1993
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-15062NHLBI NIH HHS HL-36049NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL036049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical forces associated with blood flow play important roles in the acute control of vascular tone, the regulation of arterial structure and remodeling, and the localization of atherosclerotic lesions. Major regulation of the blood vessel responses occurs by the action of hemodynamic shear stresses on the endothelium. The transmission of hemodynamic forces throughout the endothelium and the mechanotransduction mechanisms that lead to biophysical, biochemical, and gene regulatory responses of endothelial cells to hemodynamic shear stresses are reviewed.

Indexed as

Blood CirculationSignal TransductionAnimalsEndothelium, VascularHemodynamicsHumansMechanoreceptors

Identifiers

PMID7624393
PMCPMC3053532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.