Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7621580›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1995

Influence of the genetic pattern and sex of mice in experimental paracoccidioidomycosis.

L M Singer-Vermes, T N Sakamoto, C A Vaz, V L Calich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L M Singer-VermesDepto. de Immunologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.
T N Sakamoto
C A Vaz
V L Calich
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eight genetically different strains of mice were compared regarding the dissemination of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis to the lungs, liver and omentum/pancreas, DTH responses and specific antibody production at 16 weeks after intraperitoneal infection with Pb18, a virulent P. brasiliensis isolate. The degree of dissemination of the infection varied: B10.A and C57B1/6, the most susceptible mouse strains, had positive cultures and high colony-forming unit (CFU) counts in all analysed organs. DBA/2 and A/Sn mice had negative cultures, being thus classified as the most resistant strains. CBA/J, C3H/HeJ, F1(A/SnxB10.A) and BALB/c mice were regarded as relatively resistant, since discrete fungal growth was observed only in one or two of the studied organs. All mouse strains, except B10.A mice, produced specific DTH responses which did not seem to be associated with the severity of disease. Production of high levels of specific antibodies was found in all strains except in the DBA/2 and C57B1/6 mice. The influence of the host sex on the outcome of paracoccidioidomycosis was evident only in susceptible animals: female B10.A mice displayed lower CFU counts in the three examined organs, whereas no differences were found between male and female A/Sn animals. The higher resistance of female B10.A mice was not accompanied by differences in their capacity to maintain a DTH reaction, nor in their production of antibody. This fact argues against the widely believed association of susceptibility to P. brasiliensis infection with both impaired DTH reactivity and increased humoral response.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, FungalFemaleHypersensitivity, DelayedMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsParacoccidioidesParacoccidioidomycosisSex FactorsAntibodies, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID7621580
PMCPMC1553286
OpenAlexW1964034986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.