ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Effects of semotiadil fumarate, a novel Ca2+ antagonist, on cytosolic Ca2+ level and force of contraction in porcine coronary arteries.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying the origins of population variability in cardiac electrical activity through sensitivity analysis of the electrocardiogram.The Journal of physiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The mechanisms of action of semotiadil fumarate, a novel Ca2+ antagonist, were examined by measuring the cytosolic Ca2+ level ([Ca2+]i) and force of contraction in porcine coronary arteries, and by determining [3H]-pyrilamine binding to bovine cerebellar membranes. 2. Semotiadil or verapamil (0.1 and 1 microM) inhibited both the high KCl-induced increases in [Ca2+]i and force in a concentration-dependent manner. 3. Histamine (30 microM) produced transient increases followed by sustained increases in [Ca2+]i and force, which were inhibited by semotiadil and verapamil (1 and 10 microM). The agents were different in that semotiadil reduced the maximum [Ca2+]i and force responses to histamine, but not pD2 values, whereas verapamil did reduce the pD2 values for histamine, but not the maximum responses. 4. Verapamil (10 microM), but not semotiadil, inhibited histamine-induced increases in [Ca2+]i and force in Ca(2+)-free solution. Neither semotiadil nor verapamil affected the increases in [Ca2+]i and force induced by caffeine. Semotiadil even at the higher concentration (10 microM) did not displace specific binding of [3H]-pyrilamine to bovine cerebellar membranes. 5. These results suggest that semotiadil inhibits both KCl- and histamine-induced contractions mainly by blocking voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.