Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7620699›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995

Endothelin ETA and ETB mRNA and receptors expressed by smooth muscle in the human vasculature: majority of the ETA sub-type.

A P Davenport, G O'Reilly, R E Kuc

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Endothelin.Pharmacological reviews · 2016
    Review
  7. Lung Circulation.Comprehensive Physiology · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is urotensin-II the new endothelin?British journal of pharmacology · 2002
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A P DavenportClinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital.
G O'Reilly
R E Kuc
University of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. We measured the ratio of ETA and ETB sub-types in the media (containing mainly smooth muscle) of human cardiac arteries (aorta, pulmonary and coronary), internal mammary arteries and saphenous veins. 2. In saturation experiments, [125I]-endothelin-1 ([125I]-ET-1) bound with high affinity to the media of each vessel (n = 3 individuals or homogenate preparations +/- s.e. mean): coronary artery, KD = 0.14 +/- 0.02 nM, Bmax = 71.0 +/- 21.0 fmol mg-1 protein; pulmonary artery, KD = 0.85 +/- 0.25 nM, Bmax = 15.2 +/- 10.3 fmol mg-1 protein; aorta, KD = 0.51 +/- 0.02 nM, Bmax = 9.4 +/- 4.4 fmol mg-1 protein; internal mammary artery. KD = 0.34 +/- 0.31 nM, Bmax = 2.0 +/- 0.5 fmol mg-1 protein and saphenous vein, KD = 0.28 +/- 0.05 nM, Bmax = 52.8 +/- 1.0 fmol mg-1 protein. In each vessel, over the concentration-range tested, Hill slopes were close to unity and a one site fit was preferred to a two site model. 3. In competition binding assays, the ETA selective ligand, BQ123 inhibited the binding of 0.1 nM [125I]-ET-1 to the media in a biphasic manner. In each case, a two site fit was preferred to a one or three site model: coronary artery, KDETA = 0.85 +/- 0.03 nM, KDETB = 7.58 +/- 2.27 microM, ratio = 89:11%; pulmonary artery, KDETA = 0.27 +/- 0.05 nM, KDETB = 24.60 +/- 5.34 microM, ratio = 92:8%; aorta, KDETA = 0.80 +/- 0.40 nM, KDETB = 2.67 +/- 2.60 microM ratio = 89:11%; saphenous vein, KDETA = 0.55 +/- 0.17 nM, KDETB = 14.4 +/- 0.26 microM, 85:15% (n = 3 individuals or homogenate preparations +/- s.e. mean). BQ123 showed up to 18000 fold selectivity for the ETA over the ETB sub-type. The ETA-selective ligand, [125I]-PD151242 labelled 85% of the receptors detected by a fixed concentration of [125I]-ET-1 in media of internal mammary artery, measured by quantitative autoradiography. In contrast, the density of ETB receptors detected with [125I]-BQ3020 was 7.0 +/- 1.5 amol mm-2, representing about 8% of [125I]-ET-1. 4. A single band corresponding to the expected position for mRNA encoding the ETA receptor (299 base pairs) was found in the media in each of the five vessels (n = 3 individuals) using reverse transcript as epolymerase chain reaction assays. A single band corresponding to the ETB sub-type (428 base pairs) was also always detected.5. 35S-labelled antisense probes to ETA and ETB hybridised to the media of epicardial coronary arteries as well as intramyocardial vessels, confirming the presence of mRNA encoding both sub-types in the vascular smooth muscle of the vessel wall.6 Although mRNA for both receptors was detected, competition binding using BQ123 demonstrated that the majority (at least 85%) of ET receptors present in smooth muscle are the ETA sub-type. These results provide further support for the hypothesis that the ETA sub-type is the receptor that must be blocked in humans to produce a beneficial vasodilatation in pathophysiological conditions where there is an increase in peptide concentration or receptor density.

Indexed as

AdultArteriesEndothelinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, Smooth, VascularPolymerase Chain ReactionRadioligand AssayReceptors, EndothelinRNA, MessengerSaphenous VeinEndothelinsReceptors, EndothelinRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID7620699
PMCPMC1510347
OpenAlexW2071247562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.