Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7619584›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1995

Innovation in general practice: is the gap between training and non-training practices getting wider?

R Baker, J Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In celebration of GP education.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health promotion innovation in primary health care.The Australasian medical journal · 2013
    Article
  7. A healthy disposition? The use and limitations of the characteristics approach to general practice research.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
  8. Supporting practice-based audit: a price to be paid for collecting data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Forty-seven minutes a year for the patient.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  11. A survey of audit activity in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  12. Training for audit.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  13. Will the future GP remain a personal doctor?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  14. Training for audit: lessons still to be learned.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  15. The science of perpetual change.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1996
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R BakerEli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice, University of Leicester.
J Thompson
National Audit Office · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraining practices are more developed than non-training practices in terms of a wide range of educational and clinical activities, facilities and staff. If training practices are also adopting new innovations at a faster rate than non-training practices the gap between them will increase.

aimThe aim of this study was to determine whether, between 1982 and 1990, training practices did develop at a faster rate than non-training practices.

methodIn 1982 a questionnaire was sent to 153 practices in Gloucestershire, Avon and Somerset which all had one or more partners who were members of the Royal College of General Practitioners. A second questionnaire was sent to the same practices in 1990. Information was sought about practice features including organization, size, facilities, staff and clinical and educational activities. A total of 124 practices (62 training and non-training) completed questionnaires on both occasions.

resultsThere were substantial changes in the cohort between the surveys in 1982 and 1990, with many practices gaining, for example, a practice manager, practice nurse and purpose built premises, and introducing audits, screening activities and specific clinics. For each feature of practice a logistic regression was undertaken with training used as an explanatory variable. Training practices were more likely to develop than non-training practices for a number of features including personnel, aspects of practice organization, educational activities, clinical activities and equipment.

conclusionTraining practices are not only more developed than non-training practices but are also more innovative. The gap between training and non-training practices did grow wider between 1982 and 1990. This may be because the members of training practices are inherently more innovative, face fewer obstacles to innovation or that the scheme for approval of practices for training has encouraged specific innovations. Any future accreditation scheme for general practices must be organized to encourage accelerated development in less developed practices rather than only stimulate innovation in already advanced practices.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID7619584
PMCPMC1239263
OpenAlexW1491482347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.