Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7613323›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995

Audit in general practice: factors influencing participation.

R Baker, N Robertson, A Farooqi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Marked differences in GPs' diagnosis of pneumonia between Denmark and Spain: a cross-sectional study.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Morbidity and mortality audits: "How to"for family practice.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2005
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Nurses' participation in audit: a regional study.Quality in health care : QHC · 1998
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Is general practice audit alive and well? The view from Portsmouth.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1996
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R BakerEli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital.
N Robertson
A Farooqi
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the factors influencing participation in a single topic audit initiated by a medical audit advisory group.

designInterview and questionnaire survey of general practitioners who had been invited to take part in an audit of vitamin B-12.

settingAll 147 general practices in Leicestershire.

main outcome measuresAspects of structure, attitude, and behaviour that influenced participation or non-participation.

results75 practices completed the audit, 49 withdrew after initial agreement, and 23 refused to take part at the outset. Participants were more likely than those who refused to view the advisory group as useful or a threat and to have positive thoughts about audit but less likely to have previously undertaken audit entailing implementation of change. Participants were more likely than those who withdrew to have positive thoughts about audit and to have discussed whether to take part within the practice but were less likely to view the advisory group as useful. The most common reason given for withdrawal was lack of time.

conclusionsParticipation was influenced by attitudes towards audit in general and the advisory group in particular and by aspects of behaviour such as communication within the practice. Practical support and resources may help some practices undertake audit, but advisory groups must also deal with attitudes and unsatisfactory communication in practice teams.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMedical AuditAnemia, PerniciousBehaviorEnglandFamily PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesVitamin B 12Vitamin B 12

Identifiers

PMID7613323
PMCPMC2550086
OpenAlexW2073016608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.