Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7612812›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1995

A look at membrane patches with a scanning force microscope.

J K Hörber, J Mosbacher, W Häberle, J P Ruppersberg, B Sakmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Twenty odd years of stretch-sensitive channels.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2006
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Voltage-induced membrane displacement in patch pipettes activates mechanosensitive channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J K HörberEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Mosbacher
W Häberle
J P Ruppersberg
B Sakmann
Max Planck Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We combined scanning force microscopy with patch-clamp techniques in the same experimental setup and obtained images of excised membrane patches spanning the tip of a glass pipette. These images indicate that cytoskeleton structures are still present in such membrane patches and form a strong connection between the membrane and the glass wall. This gives the membrane patch the appearance of a tent, stabilized by a scaffold of ropes. The lateral resolution of the images depends strongly on the observed structures and can reach values as low as 10 nm on the cytoskeleton elements of a (inside-out) patch. The observations suggest that measurements of membrane elasticity can be made, opening the way for further studies on mechanical properties of cell membranes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell MembraneElasticityFemaleGlassMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, StructuralOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID7612812
PMCPMC1282072
OpenAlexW2046833667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.