ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Bronchodilator and pre-protective effects of urodilatin in bovine bronchi in vitro: comparison with atrial natriuretic peptide.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. This study examined the activity and mechanisms of action of urodilatin in bovine bronchi. For comparison, the ability of urodilatin to evoke bronchodilatation or protect against subsequent challenge was compared to that of the closely related peptide alpha-human atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). 2. Urodilatin reversed methacholine-evoked contraction in a concentration-dependent manner in bovine bronchi. In the absence of any attempt to prevent degradation by neutral endopeptidases, urodilatin was more potent than ANP in this tissue. 3. The bronchodilator properties of urodilatin were significantly augmented by the neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, phosphoramidon (3.68 x 10(-5) M). This provides evidence for at least partial degradation of urodilatin by neutral endopeptidases. With phosphoramidon present, urodilatin and ANP were equipotent. 4. In the presence of phosphoramidon (3.68 x 10(-5) M), pre-incubation with urodilatin (10(-6) M) had a protective effect against subsequent methacholine-induced contraction. This action of urodilatin was quantitatively similar to that of ANP in the presence of this endopeptidase inhibitor. 5. The actions of urodilatin appear to involve ATP-sensitive K+ channels since tolbutamide (10(-6) - 10(-5) M) significantly attenuated the relaxations induced by this peptide. 6. Small conductance Ca(2+)-activated K+ channels seem likewise to be implicated in the actions of urodilatin since blockade of these channels with apamin (10(-7) - 10(-6) M) resulted in a marked attenuation of urodilatin-evoked responses. 7. The presence of charybdotoxin (10-9 M-10-M) had no significant effect on subsequent responses tourodilatin suggesting that large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels are not involved in the relaxations evoked by this peptide.8. In the presence of phosphoramidon (3.68 x 10-5 M), urodilatin (10-6 M) evoked elevation of cyclic GMP levels within bovine bronchial tissue. Levels of cyclic GMP increased significantly within 5-10 s in response to this peptide and preceded the initiation of relaxant responses. Maximum increases in cyclic GMP levels were reached within 5 min; the time required for maximal relaxation evoked by this peptide.9. In conclusion, urodilatin, like ANP reversed and protected against, subsequent methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction; an action enhanced by the presence of phosphoramidon (3.68 x 1O-5 M).Associated with these actions of urodilatin was a rise in cyclic GMP levels as well as the opening of ATP-sensitive K+ and small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.