ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Contractile activity of endothelin precursors in the isolated gallbladder of the guinea-pig: presence of an endothelin-converting enzyme.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A single addition of 3 x I0-7 M ET-1, ET-2 or ET-3 produced contractions that reached a steady state in 28.2 +/- 4.2, 21.1 +/- 1.3 and 24.0 +/- 3.8 min, respectively and took 2.7 +/- 0.4, 2.1 + 0.1 and 1.6 +/- 0.1 min to reach half of this steady-state response.4. Contractions induced by 3 x I0-7 M big ET-11-38 or big ET-11- 39 reached a plateau in 38.5 +/- 3.6 and 35.6 +/- 3.3 min, respectively, and half of these responses were attained in 12.0 +/- 2.5 and 7.1 +/- 1.1 min.Thus, these contractions developed more slowly than those induced by ET-1. Contractions induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-21-38 were also much slower to develop than those to ET-2, for these took 49 +/- 2 min to reach plateau and 19.4 +/- 2.1 min to attain half that response. Contractions induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-31-41 amide took 50.2 +/- 3.7 min to reach a plateau and 27.3 +/- 3.0 min to reach half of this response.5. Phosphoramidon (0.1, 1 and 3 x 10-4 M) inhibited contractions induced by big ET-11.39. For instance,the contractions induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-11-39 were inhibited by 10-4 M or 3 x 10-4 M of phosphoramidon by 62.8 +/- 6.7% or 74.5 +/- 4.6%, respectively. Similarly, contractions induced by ET-21-38 were inhibited by 91.3 +/- 5.4% and the small response induced by big ET-3l-4l amide was abolished by 3 x 10-4M phosphoramidon. Conversely, the neutral endopeptidase (EC 24.11) inhibitor DL-thiorphan(3 x 10-4 M) had no effect. Captopril (10-5 M), pepstatin A (10-5 M), phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride(PMSF, 10-3 M), aprotinin (10-5 M), E-64 (10-5 M), cystatin (10-6 M), leupeptin (10-4 M),chymostatin (10-4 M), or bestatin (10-5 M) did not inhibit but rather increased to a similar, but small degree the contractions induced by 3 to 30 x 10-9 M big ET-11-39. Only captopril (10-5 M) or leupeptin(10-4 M) increased the contraction induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-11-39. Phosphoramidon (10-4 M),pepstatin (10-5 M) or PMSF (10-3 M) did not affect contractions induced by ET-1.6. Removal of the epithelium increased by 70% the size of the contraction induced by 5 microM histamine(1.08 +/- 0.05 g; n = 160 to 1.84 +/- 0.14 g; n = 12) but did not affect, in absolute terms, the contraction induced by ET-1 (as a % of the response to histamine, these responses were, of course, apparently depressed). Epithelium removal did, however, increase the size of the contractions induced by 3 to 30 x 10-9 M big ET-1 -39 which was very similar to the effect of the protease inhibitors.7. In competition binding studies on membranes prepared from the guinea-pig gallbladder, 10-11 MET-1 inhibited by 76.9 +/- 3.1% the binding of [125]-ET-I while porcine big ET-11-39 caused no inhibition(0.7 +/- 3.0; n = 3). ET-1 (10-6 M) inhibited binding by 95.7 =/- 1.1% (n = 3) while at this much higher concentration, big ET-11-39 inhibited binding by only 16.8 +/- 4.2% (n = 3). This clearly suggests that big ET-11-39 does not bind directly to ET receptors.8. Thus, a phosphoramidon-sensitive endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE), different from neutral endopeptidase (NEP; EC 24.11) and not located on the epithelium, converts big ET-1 into ET-1 in the gallbladder of the guinea-pig. This ECE appears to act preferentially on big ET-1 or big ET-2 over bigET-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.