ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Neuroprotective profile of lifarizine (RS-87476) in rat cerebrocortical neurones in culture.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incorporation of sodium channel blocking and free radical scavenging activities into a single drug, AM-36, results in profound inhibition of neuronal apoptosis.British journal of pharmacology · 2001Article
- Inhibition by lifarizine of intracellular Ca2+ rises and glutamate exocytosis in depolarized rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes and cultured neurones.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
- Neuroprotective efficacy of lifarizine (RS-87476) in a simplified rat survival model of 2 vessel occlusion.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Neuroprotective properties of lifarizine compared with those of other agents in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischaemia.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- [3H]-lifarizine, a high affinity probe for inactivated sodium channels.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The ability of the neuroprotective agent, lifarizine (RS-87476), to mitigate veratridine-, cyanide- and glutamate-induced toxicity in rat embryonic cerebrocortical neurones in primary culture has been compared with that of tetrodotoxin (TTX), nitrendipine, (+)-MK-801 and (-)-MK-801. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released into the culture medium was used as the indicator of cell viability. 2. Incubation of cultures for 16 h in a medium containing veratridine (10(-4) M), sodium glutamate (10(-3) M) or sodium cyanide (10(-3) M) resulted in consistent elevations of LDH activity in the culture medium. The ability of compounds to attenuate these elevations was expressed as the concentration required to inhibit the increases in LDH release by 50% (IC50). 3. Neurotoxicity induced by veratridine was inhibited by lifarizine (IC50 = 4 x 10(-7) M), TTX (IC50 = 3 x 10(-8) M) and nitrendipine (IC50 = 3 x 10(-5) M). In contrast, (+)-MK-801 (up to 3 x 10(-5) M) was ineffective against this insult. 4. Glutamate-induced neurotoxicity was inhibited by (+)-MK-801 (IC50 = 1.4 x 10(-8) M) and to a lesser extent by (-)-MK-801 (IC50 = 1 x 10(-7) M), but was unaffected by lifarizine, TTX or nitrendipine (up to 10(-6) M). 5. (+)-MK-801 was effective against sodium cyanide-induced neurotoxicity (IC50 = 1.9 x 10(-8) M), whereas lifarizine and TTX (up to 10(-6) M) and nitrendipine (up to 3 x 10(-6) M) were without protective activity against this insult. 6. The results demonstrate that lifarizine potently protects rat cortical neurones in vitro against a neurotoxic insult that requires activation of sodium channels for its expression, and that the compound is ineffective against insults mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation. The weak efficacy of nitrendipine against veratridine-induced cell death argues against the involvement of L-type calcium channels in this insult. These data are consistent with the notion that the neuroprotective activity oflifarizine observed in vivo may be mediated by inhibition of neuronal sodium currents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.