Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7591185›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health1995

Carbon disulphide. III. Risk factors for coronary heart diseases in workers in the viscose industry.

H Drexler, K Ulm, M Hubmann, R Hardt, T Göen, W Mondorf, E Lang, J Angerer, G Lehnert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Increased intima-media thickness in rayon workers after long-term exposure to carbon disulfide.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Carbon disulphide. IV. Cardiovascular function in workers in the viscose industry.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 1996
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H DrexlerInstitute and Out-patient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
K Ulm
M Hubmann
R Hardt
T Göen
W Mondorf
E Lang
J Angerer
G Lehnert
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate risk factors for coronary heart disease and factors which can influence the course of acute myocardial infarction in workers exposed to CS2 we performed a cross-sectional study of 247 workers in the viscose industry. The control group of 222 men from the same plant was comparable for age, social status and physical work. The CS2 exposure determined by personal air sampling ranged from < 0.2 ppm to 65.7 ppm (median: 4.0 ppm) and the duration of exposure ranged from 4 to 220 (median: 66) months. Using a multiple linear regression model we found neither higher blood pressure at rest or after exercise, nor hyperlipoproteinaemia in a higher degree, nor lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or lower apolipoprotein A-I levels, nor higher blood glucose values, nor indicators of direct cardiotoxic effects or signs of disturbances in blood coagulation in the exposed group in comparison to controls. Regarding the influence of chronic exposure on the investigated parameters, we found an inverse correlation of the cumulative exposure (mean CS2 exposure in the department multiplied by the duration of work in this department) with the HDL concentration. The HDL levels correlated with the duration but not with the intensity of exposure. In the same way the apolipoprotein A-I levels showed a negative association with the duration of exposure in the exposed group as well as in the control group. The HDL concentrations showed the same trend for the controls. It therefore seems that this finding is more likely due to confounding factors than to the CS2 exposure. As all subjects (exposed and controls) have done shift work, in some cases for a long time, this kind of work could be responsible for the negative relationship between the duration of employment as a shift worker and the apolipoprotein A-I and HDL levels. At the current air-borne levels no significant differences were found between the exposed persons and the controls in the distribution frequency for blood pressure values, lipoproteins, blood glucose, blood coagulation and indicators of direct cardiotoxic effects.

Indexed as

CelluloseAdultBlood PressureCarbon DisulfideCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLipoproteinsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesRisk FactorsCarbon DisulfideCelluloseLipoproteinsrayon, purified

Identifiers

PMID7591185
OpenAlexW2324627979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.