Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7590427›Full record

Trial reportGut1995

Epidermal growth factor in saliva and gastric juice: response to histamine.

A M Tunio, M Hobsley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M TunioDepartment of Surgery, University College London Medical School, London.
M Hobsley
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) was measured in saliva and in gastric juice under basal conditions and after histamine stimulation (0.04 mg kg-1h-1). Sixty subjects studied comprised 20 normal volunteers, 20 patients with duodenal ulcer (DU), and 20 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). There was no difference in basal salivary EGF concentrations between control and DU or control and NUD subjects, but the EGF concentration in DU patients exceeded that in NUD patients (p < 0.05). Basal gastric juice concentrations of EGF were similar in all three groups. There was no difference between basal salivary and gastric EGF concentrations (p > > 0.05). After histamine stimulation, salivary and gastric EGF concentrations increased in all three groups: the increase was greater in gastric juice than saliva (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the salivary EGF concentrations of controls and NUD patients, or controls and DU patients, but values were significantly higher when DU and NUD patients were compared (p = < 0.05). In the gastric juice, EGF increased more in DU patients than in controls or NUD patients (p < 0.05). This effect was not linked to the greater acid secretion in DU than in the other groups. There was no influence of gender or smoking on the EGF concentration. This evidence suggests that the stomach itself may be able to secrete large amounts of EGF and that histamine is a potent stimulus. It is more likely that the gastric EGF is responding to the presence of a duodenal ulcer than that lack of EGF is responsible for persistence of the ulcer.

Indexed as

AdultDuodenal UlcerDyspepsiaEpidermal Growth FactorFemaleGastric JuiceHistamineHumansMaleMiddle AgedSalivaStimulation, ChemicalEpidermal Growth FactorHistamine

Identifiers

PMID7590427
PMCPMC1382812
OpenAlexW2040285399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.