Trial reportGut1995
Epidermal growth factor in saliva and gastric juice: response to histamine.
Trial report in Gut, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) was measured in saliva and in gastric juice under basal conditions and after histamine stimulation (0.04 mg kg-1h-1). Sixty subjects studied comprised 20 normal volunteers, 20 patients with duodenal ulcer (DU), and 20 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). There was no difference in basal salivary EGF concentrations between control and DU or control and NUD subjects, but the EGF concentration in DU patients exceeded that in NUD patients (p < 0.05). Basal gastric juice concentrations of EGF were similar in all three groups. There was no difference between basal salivary and gastric EGF concentrations (p > > 0.05). After histamine stimulation, salivary and gastric EGF concentrations increased in all three groups: the increase was greater in gastric juice than saliva (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the salivary EGF concentrations of controls and NUD patients, or controls and DU patients, but values were significantly higher when DU and NUD patients were compared (p = < 0.05). In the gastric juice, EGF increased more in DU patients than in controls or NUD patients (p < 0.05). This effect was not linked to the greater acid secretion in DU than in the other groups. There was no influence of gender or smoking on the EGF concentration. This evidence suggests that the stomach itself may be able to secrete large amounts of EGF and that histamine is a potent stimulus. It is more likely that the gastric EGF is responding to the presence of a duodenal ulcer than that lack of EGF is responsible for persistence of the ulcer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.