Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7588083›Full record

ReviewDrugs1995

Alteplase. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acute myocardial infarction.

J C Gillis, A J Wagstaff, K L Goa

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J C GillisAdis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
A J Wagstaff
K L Goa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) stimulates the fibrinolysis of blood clots by converting plasminogen to plasmin. The efficacy of intravenous alteplase in the early treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction has been unequivocally proven, and recent results from the GUSTO trial indicate a significant advantage in 30-day survival for alteplase in an accelerated dosage regimen (< or = 100mg infused over 90 minutes rather than 3 hours) over streptokinase. The advantage of the accelerated alteplase dosage regimen seems to be maintained for at least 1 year. The role of heparin as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis remains to be fully defined but heparin administration appears to be more important in conjunction with alteplase than with streptokinase. Ideally, patients should receive alteplase as soon as possible after the onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction and, while therapy is most beneficial when administered early, survival is improved when the drug is administered up to 12 hours after symptom onset. The accelerated regimen of alteplase used in the GUSTO trial demonstrated a survival advantage in patients < or = 75 as well as those > 75 years of age which was at least as great as that seen with streptokinase. Similarly, alteplase reduces mortality in patients with both anterior and inferior infarctions; however, those with anterior wall infarctions show an improved outcome over those with inferior infarcts. On the basis of pharmacoeconomic analysis of GUSTO data, the accelerated alteplase regimen cost an estimated additional $US32,678 per year of life saved compared with a conventional streptokinase regimen. Cumulative 1-year costs were greater in patients who received the accelerated alteplase regimen but survival was significantly greater than in patients who received streptokinase. No difference in quality of life was evident in patients who received either treatment. The incidence of major haemorrhage associated with alteplase therapy appears to be similar to that seen with other fibrinolytic agents, increasing with increasing dose; however, the risk of stroke, particularly haemorrhagic stroke, is higher with alteplase than with streptokinase. Thus, alteplase has become firmly established as a first-line option in the management of acute myocardial infarction. On the basis of accumulated evidence, the greatest risk reduction with alteplase therapy may be in certain high risk groups, such as those with anterior infarcts, selected elderly patients and those who present late after symptom onset.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgingCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Administration ScheduleDrug EvaluationDrug Therapy, CombinationFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMyocardial InfarctionPlasminogen ActivatorsThrombosisTissue Plasminogen ActivatorTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftFibrinolytic AgentsPlasminogen ActivatorsTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID7588083
OpenAlexW2083056898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.