Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7587591›Full record

ReviewChromosoma1995

Mechanisms of DNA expansion.

C T McMurray

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emerging drivers of DNA repeat expansions.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  4. Mechanisms of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. STRs: Ancient Architectures of the Genome beyond the Sequence.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2021
    Review
  6. Gene Variant ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cytomolecular discrimination of the AJournal of applied genetics · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trinucleotide expansion in disease: why is there a length threshold?Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bin mapping of genomic and EST-derived SSRs in melon (Cucumis melo L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2008
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2007
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C T McMurrayMayo Foundation and Graduate School, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Pharmacology, Molecular Neuroscience Program, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. mcmurray@mayo.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unstable transmission of repeating segments in genes is now recognized as a new class of mutations causing human disease. Genetic instability observed in disease is termed an "expansion mutation" when the mutation is an increase in the copy number of a repeated unit, commonly a di- or trinucleotide. While the expansion mutation is well characterized in disease, the mechanism by which expansion occurs is not clear. This article focuses on physical properties of expansion at repeating nucleotides that may provide clues to the mechanism. Both biochemical and genetic data indicate that DNA structure is part of the mechanism and the underlying cause for expansion.

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsMutationBase SequenceDNA ReplicationGene ConversionGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID7587591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.