Synthetic human antibodies.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Targeting Intracellular Antigens with pMHC-Binding Antibodies: A Phage Display Approach.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
   Article
2. Construction of a rationally designed antibody platform for sequencing-assisted selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
   Article
3. Transferring the characteristics of naturally occurring and biased antibody repertoires to human antibody libraries by trapping CDRH3 sequences.PloS one · 2012
   Article
4. Generation of recombinant guinea pig antibody fragments to the human GABAC receptor.Journal of immunological methods · 2011
   Article
5. Phage-encoded combinatorial chemical libraries based on bicyclic peptides.Nature chemical biology · 2009
   Article
6. A phage display approach for rapid antibody humanization: designed combinatorial V gene libraries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
   Article
7. Peptide-specific killing of antigen-presenting cells by a recombinant antibody-toxin fusion protein targeted to major histocompatibility complex/peptide class I complexes with T cell receptor-like specificity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1997
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as