ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Comparison of the interaction of agmatine and crude methanolic extracts of bovine lung and brain with alpha 2-adrenoceptor binding sites.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agmatine: biological role and therapeutic potentials in morphine analgesia and dependence.The AAPS journal · 2006Review
- Effect of agmatine on the development of morphine dependence in rats: potential role of cAMP system.European journal of pharmacology · 2004Article
- Biological significance of agmatine, an endogenous ligand at imidazoline binding sites.British journal of pharmacology · 2001Review
- Dual interaction of agmatine with the rat alpha(2D)-adrenoceptor: competitive antagonism and allosteric activation.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
- Neurochemical evidence for agmatine modulation of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) neurotoxicity.Neurochemical researchArticle
- Agmatine suppresses the imidazoline IInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
1. In the present study we have evaluated whether alpha 2-adrenoceptor binding sites on bovine cerebral cortex membranes labelled by [3H]-clonidine, [3H]-idazoxan and [3H]-RX-821002 can distinguish between known agonists and antagonists. This model has then been used to compare the binding profiles of the putative non-catecholamine, clonidine-displacing substance (CDS), agmatine and crude methanolic extracts of bovine lung and brain. 2. Saturation studies carried out in the presence and absence of noradrenaline, 10 mumol 1(-1), revealed that the maximum number of binding sites on bovine cerebral cortex membranes for [3H]-idazoxan and [3H]-RX-821002 were approximately 60-80% greater than those for [3H]-clonidine (62.6 fmol mg-1 protein). Rauwolscine, the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, was approximately 100 fold more potent against each of the ligands than the selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor diastereoisomer, corynanthine. Also, the pKi value for the selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor prazosin against each ligand was less than 6. 3. Adrenaline, UK-14034, rauwolscine, corynanthine, RX-811059 and prazosin produced concentration-dependent inhibition of binding of all three 3H-ligands. The agonists, adrenaline and UK-14304, were approximately 5 and 10 fold less potent against [3H]-idazoxan and [3H]-RX-821002, respectively, than against [3H]-clonidine. In marked contrast, the antagonists, rauwolscine, corynanthine, RX-811059 and prazosin exhibited a different profile, being approximately 2-3 fold more potent against sites labelled by [3H]-RX-821002 and [3H]-idazoxan compared to sites labelled by [3H]-clonidine. 4. Agmatine and histamine produced a concentration-dependent displacement of [3H]-clonidine, [3H]-idazoxan and [3H]-RX-821002 binding to bovine cerebral cortex membranes. The pKi values for agmatine and histamine were independent of the 3H-ligand employed, approximately 4.8 and 4.5,respectively.5. Crude methanolic extracts of bovine brain and lung produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of [3H]-clonidine binding to bovine cerebral cortex membranes (>90%). Based on the volume of the extract that caused 50% inhibition of [3H]-clonidine binding, bovine lung contains 3 fold more CDS than bovine brain. Both extracts were at least 5 fold more potent against a2-adrenoceptor sites labelled by[3H]-clonidine than those labelled by [3H]-idazoxan and [3H]-RX-821002.6. All three 3H-ligands label the same population of alpha2-adrenoceptor binding sites on bovine cerebral cortex membranes, but [3H]-clonidine appears to label selectively the 'agonist' state of the sites: for which known agonists, adrenaline and UK-14304, exhibit a higher affinity. Our results indicate that neither agmatine nor histamine can account for the CDS activity present in crude extracts of bovine brain and lung. Moreover, these extracts appear to possess a binding profile similar to that of adrenaline and UK-14304, suggesting that they may possess agonist activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.