ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Central versus peripheral site of action of the tachykinin NK1-antagonist RP 67580 in inhibiting chemonociception.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of neurokinin type 1 receptor in nociception at the periphery and the spinal level in the rat.Spinal cord · 2016Article
- Substance P signaling mediates BMP-dependent heterotopic ossification.Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2011Article
- TRPV1-mediated protection against endotoxin-induced hypotension and mortality in rats.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2008Article
- Characterization of central and peripheral effects of septide with the use of five tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists in the rat.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Many studies indicate an involvement of substance P in the transmission of nociceptive stimuli, without, however, presenting any conclusive evidence as to its exact site and mode of action. The present experiments tested the involvement of substance P in the mediation of chemical nociception using the non-peptidic specific tachykinin NK1-receptor antagonist, RP 67580 (2-[1-imino-2-(2-methoxyphenyl-ethyl]-7,7diphenyl-4-perhydroiso indolone (3aR, 7aR)). 2. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intragastric pressure (IGP) were measured in anaesthetized rats. The reflex changes of these parameters in response to i.p. or s.c. injections of hydrochloric acid or capsaicin were taken to indicate nociception. 3. Intravenous administration of RP 67580 up to 5 mg kg-1 had little influence on the reflex changes in MAP or IGP in response to hydrochloric acid or capsaicin. In contrast, the sensitization of rats to i.p. capsaicin by preinjection of prostaglandin E2 was significantly reduced by 1 mg kg-1 RP 67580. 4. Intrathecal injection of 5 micrograms RP 67580 inhibited the reflex changes of MAP and IGP in response to i.p. or s.c. capsaicin whereas the inactive enantiomer RP 68651 was ineffective. 5. The results indicate that spinal NK1-receptors are involved in the acute transmission of chemically induced pain, while such receptors in the periphery take part in the sensitization by prostaglandin E2. The rather minor ability of i.v. RP 67580 to inhibit the acute nociceptive reflex is attributed to an insufficient penetration of the blood-brain-barrier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.