ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995
A purchaser perspective of managing new drugs: interferon beta as a case study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritising new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence threshold.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Review
- Getting research findings into practice. When to act on the evidence.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1998Review
- Drug rationing in the UK National Health Service. Current status and future prospects.PharmacoEconomics · 1997Review
- Article
- A purchaser experience of managing new expensive drugs: interferon beta.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
- The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many new drugs in the future will be very expensive and have major resource implications. Given current structures and legislation covering the prescribing of drugs, there are no clear means of controlling the use of these drugs to avoid diverting money away from other health care services and into drug treatment. This paper considers what mechanisms might be used by a purchaser to manage the introduction of an expensive new drug and uses interferon beta-1b for treating multiple sclerosis as an example. The most likely mechanism is the prescribing of the drug by a general practitioner on the advice of a neurologist. This would achieve a good benefit for the resources invested but would not control total expenditure. Devolving a limited budget for the drug to a specialist centre so that neurologists may prescribe it directly would be preferable, as this would link clinical, prescribing, and budgetary responsibility. These issues need to be addressed urgently by purchasers if major disruptions of services are to be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.