Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7580427›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995

Priorities and rationing: pragmatism or principles?

R Klein

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The end of the affair--public health medicine 1974-2002.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  4. Are GP leaders scared of sex?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  5. RCGP 'virtual genetics' group meeting: 'the use of the family history in primary care'.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  6. An oral history of general practice 4: changing practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  7. Defining and cultivating the virtues.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  8. Beta interferon, NICE, and rationing.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Primary care groups and NHS rationing: implications of the Child B Case.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 1999
    Article
  12. Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Article
  13. Who is doing the myth-making?Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 1996
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Internet's challenge to health care provision.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R Klein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health Care RationingHealth PrioritiesInternationalityResource AllocationAdvisory CommitteesHumansNew ZealandPatient SelectionSocial JusticeState MedicineSwedenUnited KingdomCommittee on Choices in Health Care (Netherlands)Department of Health (Great Britain)Health Care and Public HealthNational Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services (New Zealand)Parliamentary Priorities Commission (Sweden)

Identifiers

PMID7580427
PMCPMC2550780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.