Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7579490›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment1995

Maintenance of DNA content and erbB-2 alterations in intraductal and invasive phases of mammary cancer.

J D Iglehart, B J Kerns, G Huper, J R Marks

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cancer biomarker HER-2/neu in breast cancer in Indian women.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2011
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antisense DNA downregulation of the ERBB2 oncogene measured by a flow cytometric assay.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1995
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J D IglehartDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
B J Kerns
G Huper
J R Marks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast is a commonly recognized and curable clinical entity. Patients with intraductal carcinoma are at risk to develop invasive breast cancer presumably due to a transition from the noninvasive to the invasive phase of growth. Primary breast malignancies commonly display both in situ and invasive phases of growth in the same tumor. In the current study, DNA content and alterations in the erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) oncogene product were examined simultaneously in both growth phases of primary breast cancers by image analysis. DNA content in the intraductal and invasive components of primary breast cancers were virtually identical (r = 0.979, p < 0.001). Quantitative image analysis was used to measure erbB-2 expression and categories of expression were related to copy number of the erbB-2 gene. Expression of erbB-2 was similar in both growth phases and implies identity of the erbB-2 genotype. The identity of DNA content suggests that the noninvasive and invasive phases within a single breast cancer are highly related. It is likely that erbB-2 gene number remains the same during progression from intraductal to invasive disease.

Indexed as

PloidiesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell DivisionDisease ProgressionDNA, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, erbB-2HumansNeoplasm InvasivenessDNA, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID7579490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.