ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine1995
The use of the STRs HUMTH01, HUMVWA31/A, HUMF13A1, HUMFES/FPS, HUMLPL in forensic application: validation studies and population data for Galicia (NW Spain).
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic evaluation of short tandem repeats in lipid candidate genes: riding on the SNP-wave.PloS one · 2014Article
- Population study of the STRs HUMCD4 and HUMF13A1 in Catalonia (Northeast Spain).International journal of legal medicine · 1997Article
- Frequencies for five short tandem repeat (STR) systems in a population from north Poland.International journal of legal medicine · 1997Article
- Effect of environmental factors on PCR-DNA analysis from dental pulp.International journal of legal medicine · 1996Article
- Analysis of the STR loci HUMF13A01, HUMFXIIIB, HUMLIPOL, HUMTH01, HUMTPOX and HUMVWFA31 in a Japanese population.International journal of legal medicine · 1996Article
- Identification of a base pair substitution at the tetranucleotide tandem repeat locus DHFRP2 (AAAC)n in a worldwide survey.International journal of legal medicine · 1996Article
- A highly variable STR at the D12S391 locus.International journal of legal medicine · 1996Article
- Sequence analysis and allelic designation of the two short tandem repeat loci D18S51 and D8S1179.International journal of legal medicine · 1996Article
- Population data for the STR systems HumTH01, HumVWA and FES/FPS in a population sample from lower Franconia.International journal of legal medicine · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 5 tetranucleotide short tandem repeats, HUMTH01, HUMVWA31/A, HUMF13A1, HUMFES/FPS and HUMLPL were studied using different electrophoretic methods and PCR amplification conditions in order to optimize the typing conditions. A genetic population study in the population of Galicia was carried out and the allele and genotype frequencies are given. Compliance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested using different statistical parameters, with clear advantages resulting in favor of using the exact test (Guo-Thompson method) instead of conventional chi-square methods. Some statistical parameters of forensic interest (PD, CE, h) were also calculated. There were no mutations found in a total of 73 paternal meioses and 101 maternal meioses. Abnormal electrophoretic mobility was found in the AT-rich STR HUMF13A1 under non-denaturing conditions and, therefore, the use of denaturing conditions is absolutely necessary. No "stutter" bands were found, although double peaks in the HUMFES/FPS system were observed in some samples. The advantage of using automated sequencers with fluorescent technology is also reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7577690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.