Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7576307›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology

Protein-DNA interactions during phenotypic differentiation.

A L Dobi, M Palkovits, C G Palkovits, E Santha, D van Agoston

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Septamer element-binding proteins in neuronal and glial differentiation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2000
    Article
  5. Submillimolar levels of calcium regulates DNA structure at the dinucleotide repeat (TG/AC)n.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A L DobiLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4480, USA.
M Palkovits
C G Palkovits
E Santha
D van Agoston
National Institutes of Health · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have been studying the molecular mechanism of neuronal differentiation through which the multipotent precursor becomes limited to the final transmitter phenotype. Here we focused on the role of the 5' proximal regulatory cassette (-190; +53 bp) of the rat enkephalin (rENK) gene in the developmental regulation of the enkephalin phenotype. Several well characterized cis-elements, including AP2, CREB, NF1, and NFkB, reside on this region of the rENK gene. These motifs were sufficient to confer activity-dependent expression of the gene during neurodifferentiation when it was tested using transient transfection assays of primary developing spinal cord neurons treated with tetrodotoxin (TTX). This region was then used as a DNA probe in mobility shift assays, with nuclear proteins derived from phenotypically and ontogenetically distinct brain regions. Only a few low abundance protein-DNA complexes were detected and only with nuclear proteins derived from developing but not from adult brain. The spatiotemporal pattern of these complexes did not show correlation with enkephalin expression which was assessed by RT-PCR. We employed synthetic probes corresponding to consensus as well as ENK-specific sequences of the individual motifs to identify the nature of the observed bands. Although both consensus NF1 and enkCRE1(NF1) formed complexes with nuclear proteins derived from the striatum and cortex at various ages, the appearance of the bands was not correlated with ENK expression. Surprisingly, no complexes were detected if other ENK-specific motifs were used as probes. We also tested nuclear extracts derived from forskolin-induced and control C6 glioma cells, again using the whole proximal regulatory cassette as well as individual motifs. These experiments showed the formation of elaborate protein-DNA bands. There was no direct correlation between the appearance of bands and forskolin-induced ENK expression. Unexpectedly, all ENK-specific motifs formed specific and highly abundant protein-DNA complexes when nuclear extracts from the human tumor cell line (HeLa), which does not express ENK, were used. Based on these observations, we concluded that: 1. Interactions between the proximal regulatory cassette and additional probably far distant regions of the rENK gene and their binding proteins may be necessary to confer developmentally regulated, cell-specific expression of the ENK gene; and 2. Inducibility of the gene by common cis-elements can be governed by this region; however, the cell-specificity of the induction remains elusive.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsAstrocytesBase SequenceCell DifferentiationCell LineageCells, CulturedColforsinConsensus SequenceCycloheximideDNADNA, NeoplasmDNA ProbesEnkephalinsGanglia, SpinalGliomaColforsinCycloheximideDNADNA, NeoplasmDNA ProbesEnkephalinsMacromolecular SubstancesNeoplasm ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTetrodotoxinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID7576307
OpenAlexW2037822798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.