Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7573047›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1995

The 13q- syndrome: the molecular definition of a critical deletion region in band 13q32.

S Brown, J Russo, D Chitayat, D Warburton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Retinoblastoma and mosaic 13q deletion: a case report.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 13q mosaic deletion includingMolecular cytogenetics · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The sodium leak channel, NALCN, in health and disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The molecular genetics of holoprosencephaly.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BrownDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Russo
D Chitayat
D Warburton

Funding

PHYSICAL MAP OF HUMAN CHROMOSOME 13Q32K11HD000916 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI BROWN, STEPHEN A · 1990 to 1994
–
NICHD NIH HHS HD00916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with interstitial deletions of the long arm of chromosome 13 may have widely varying phenotypes. From cytogenetic analysis, we have postulated that there is a discrete region in 13q32 where deletion leads to a syndrome of severe malformations, including digital and brain anomalies. To test this hypothesis at the molecular level, we have studied the deletions in 17 patients; 5 had severe malformations, while the remaining 12 had only minor malformations. Our results indicate that the deletions in the severely affected patients all involve an overlapping region in q32, while the deletions in the mildly affected patients include some, but not all, of this overlapping region. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the severely malformed 13q- phenotype results from the deletion of a critical region in 13q32. This region is presently defined as lying between D13S136 and D13S147 and is on the order of 1 Mb in size.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13Gene DeletionAbnormalities, MultipleChromosome AberrationsChromosome DisordersChromosome MappingDNA ProbesHumansPhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionSyndromeDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID7573047
PMCPMC1801482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.