ReviewThe American journal of cardiology1995
What benefit can be derived from treating normocholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease?
Review in The American journal of cardiology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000553. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HDL-Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (HATS)
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Controversy still remains regarding the possible clinical or arteriographic benefit of intensive lipid-altering therapy in patients who have coronary artery disease and apparently normal lipid levels. Resolution of this controversy appears to depend on an improved understanding of the role of variables other than total or low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. A comparison of the "normolipidemic" subgroup of The Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study patients and The Harvard Atherosclerosis Reversibility Project patients indicates that low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated levels of apolipoprotein B appear to increase considerably the likelihood of benefit from intensive lipid-altering therapy. Other risk-related variables such as systolic blood pressure and lipoprotein(a) further contribute to the prediction of risk and possibly to the potential for treatment benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7572694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.