ArticleNucleic acids research1995
On the role of rRNA tertiary structure in recognition of ribosomal protein L11 and thiostrepton.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ribosomal Protein L11 Selectively Stabilizes a Tertiary Structure of the GTPase Center rRNA Domain.Journal of molecular biology · 2020Article
- Divalent ions tune the kinetics of a bacterial GTPase center rRNA folding transition from secondary to tertiary structure.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- NMR structure and Mg2+ binding of an RNA segment that underlies the L7/L12 stalk in the E.coli 50S ribosomal subunit.Nucleic acids research · 2005Article
- The RNA-binding domain of ribosomal protein L11 recognizes an rRNA tertiary structure stabilized by both thiostrepton and magnesium ion.Nucleic acids research · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ribosomal protein L11 and an antibiotic, thiostrepton, bind to the same highly conserved region of large subunit ribosomal RNA and stabilize a set of NH4(+)-dependent tertiary interactions within the domain. In vitro selection from partially randomized pools of RNA sequences has been used to ask what aspects of RNA structure are recognized by the ligands. L11-selected RNAs showed little sequence variation over the entire 70 nucleotide randomized region, while thiostrepton required a slightly smaller 58 nucleotide domain. All the selected mutations preserved or stabilized the known secondary and tertiary structure of the RNA. L11-selected RNAs from a pool mutagenized only around a junction structure yielded a very different consensus sequence, in which the RNA tertiary structure was substantially destabilized and L11 binding was no longer dependent on NH4+. We propose that L11 can bind the RNA in two different 'modes', depending on the presence or absence of the NH4(+)-dependent tertiary structure, while thiostrepton can only recognize the RNA tertiary structure. The different RNA recognition mechanisms for the two ligands may be relevant to their different effects on protein synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.