Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7563037›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology1995

Kinetic analysis of two simultaneously activated K+ currents in root cell protoplasts of Plantago media L.

S A Vogelzang, H B Prins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S A VogelzangECOTRANS, Dept of Plant Biology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
H B Prins
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two different, simultaneously activated outward rectifying K+ currents were analyzed in the plasmalemma of root cortex protoplasts of Plantago media. Their gating is dependent on the diffusion potential for K+(EK). The threshold potential was more negative than EK allowing small inward currents at potentials below EK thereby keeping cells with little pump activity in the K state (Vogelzang & Prins, 1994). Time and voltage dependence of the outward rectifying K+ currents have been analyzed with Hodgkin-Huxley-like (HH) models. Dynamic responses of whole cell currents to pulse potentials were analyzed with two voltage dependent functions, the Boltzmann distribution for open probability per gate and the transition rate towards the open state (alpha). The transition rate in the opposite direction (beta), was calculated from alpha and the Boltzmann distribution. These functions were used for an integral analysis of activation and deactivation currents measured over a range of pulse potentials. Both whole cell and single channel data were used for the determination of the number of closed and open states. The effects of single channel flickering on time response and amplitude of tail currents were added to the model. The dominant K+ channel present in the plasmalemma of P. media has a characteristic nonlinear single channel I-V curve reducing the amplitude of whole cell currents at positive potentials. To compensate for this nonlinearity, a four state translocator model was added to the whole cell open probability model. The analysis presented here provides a general basis for the study and comparison of K+ channel kinetics in plant protoplasts.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalIon TransportPatch-Clamp TechniquesPlantagoPotassium ChannelsProtoplastsPotassium Channels

Identifiers

PMID7563037
OpenAlexW2114359511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.