ReviewWorld journal of urology1995
Molecular cytogenetics: unraveling of the genetic composition of individual cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization and digital imaging microscopy.
Review in World journal of urology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular biology techniques allow the unraveling of the genetic alterations that cause or accompany malignant disease. Since tumors are often heterogeneous, biochemical analysis of tissue homogenates is of limited diagnostic value. This paper gives examples of methods that are presently operational to analyze the genetic composition of individual cells. They are based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and digital imaging microscopy. First, the current status of indirect and direct FISH staining methods with respect to probe labeling, detection sensitivity, multiplicity, and DNA resolution is summarized. Microscope hardware as well as charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras required for FISH analysis are then described. Applications potentially important for the analysis of urological malignancies, such as the automated enumeration of chromosomal abnormalities (counting of dots in interphase cells) and high-resolution DNA mapping on highly extended chromatin, are described in detail. Finally, the limitations of the present methodology and its future prospects are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.