Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7549689›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995

What do we known about fundholding in general practice?

J Dixon, H Glennerster

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The rationale for a spine registry.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2006
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Setting budgets for general practice in the new NHS.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. General practice fundholding: progress to date.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Review
  14. Specialist outreach clinics in general practice: what do they offer?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Article
  15. UK general practice fundholding.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 1997
    Review
  16. Does GP fundholding affect the use of tertiary services in the UK?Journal of epidemiology and community health · 1997
    Article
  17. Research into purchasing health care: time to face the challenge.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 1996
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Health reforms: a New Zealand perspective.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1996
    Article
  20. Promoting clinical effectiveness.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J DixonHealth Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
H Glennerster

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The general practice fundholding scheme was introduced four years ago. So far its impact has not been formally evaluated nationally, but review of published research shows some trends. Fundholding has curbed prescribing costs and given general practitioners greater power to lever improvements in hospital services--for example, reducing waiting times for hospital treatment--but fundholding practices may have received more money than non-fundholding practices. The impact of fundholding on transactions costs, equity, and quality of care (particularly for patients of non-fundholding general practitioners) is unknown. Research into costly reforms such as fundholding needs to be coordinated.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationFamily PracticeFinancing, GovernmentHealth Care CostsHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHospital-Physician RelationsHumansPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareReferral and ConsultationState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID7549689
PMCPMC2550722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.