ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995
Review of prescribed treatment for children with asthma in 1990.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inhaled disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) as maintenance therapy in children with asthma: a systematic review.Thorax · 2000Pooled it
- Management of severe asthma in children.Lancet (London, England) · 2010Review
- Management of unresponsive asthma.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2004Review
- Treatment for newly diagnosed hypertension: patterns of prescribing and antihypertensive effectiveness in the UK.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2003Article
- Difficult asthma in children.Thorax · 2002Review
- The impact of corticosteroids on growth and bone health.Archives of disease in childhood · 2002Article
- Anti-asthmatic drugs and dosage forms in children: a cross-sectional study.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 2002Article
- Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in asthmatic children.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2001Review
- Article
- Nebulizers in general practice--impending redundancy?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997Article
- Influence of ethnic group on asthma treatment in children in 1990-1: national cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
- Review of prescribed treatment for children with asthma. Weaknesses in methods and analysis limit conclusions.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1995Article
- Review of prescribed treatment for children with asthma. More recent data suggest guidelines are being adhered to.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review treatment prescribed to asthmatic children in Great Britain during the 12 months after publication of the first guidelines and to assess effectiveness of prophylactic treatment.
designReview of prescribing information from January 1990 to June 1991 in a representative sample of general practices in Great Britain with a Compufile/AAH Meditel computer. SUBJECTS: 17,846 children with asthma aged 4-17 years.
main outcome measuresNumbers of children prescribed different asthma treatments; estimated use of inhaled beta agonists in those receiving prophylactic treatment.
resultsFrom January to December 1990, 9,362 (52.5%) children were prescribed preventive treatments. 16,211 (90.8%) children were prescribed bronchodilators of some kind. 3,055 (17.1%) were prescribed sodium cromoglycate, and the proportion decreased significantly during the study (from 19.5% (95% confidence interval 18.6% to 20.4%) to 17.2% (16.4% to 18.1%), P < 0.001, in children aged 4-11 years and from 14.9% (14.0% to 15.9%) to 11.3% (10.4% to 12.2%), P < 0.001, in those aged 12-17 during January-July 1991). 6,952 (39.0%) were prescribed inhaled steroids, and the proportion increased during the study (from 35.1% (34.0% to 36.2%) to 44.1% (43.0% to 45.2%), P < 0.001, in children aged 4-11 years and from 38.7% (37.4% to 40.0%) to 44.1% (42.7% to 45.5%), P < 0.001, in those aged 12-17 during January-July 1991). Only 1,358 of the 9,362 children (14.5%) received sufficient repeat prescriptions to suggest that they might be taking the prophylactic treatment regularly. Among these children short acting inhaled beta agonists were being used on average four to eight times a day.
conclusionsThese results are useful baseline data for audit of the impact of published clinical guidelines, particularly in terms of reducing the need for short acting inhaled beta agonists with prophylactic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.