ArticleBiological cybernetics1995
Kinetic models of odor transduction implemented as artificial neural networks. Simulations of complex response properties of honeybee olfactory neurons.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Rapid odor processing in the honeybee antennal lobe network.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a formal model of olfactory transduction corresponding to the biochemical reaction cascade found in chemosensory neurons. It assumes that odorants bind to receptor proteins which, in turn, activate transducer mechanisms corresponding to second messenger-mediated processes. The model is reformulated as a mathematically equivalent artificial neural network (ANN). To enable comparison of the computational power of our model, previously suggested models of chemosensory transduction are also presented in ANN versions. In ANNs, certain biological parameters, such as rate constants and affinities, are transformed into weights that can be fitted by training with a given experimental data set. After training, these weights do not necessarily equal the real biological parameters, but represent a set of values that is sufficient to simulate an experimental set of data. We used ANNs to simulate data recorded from bee subplacodes and compare the capacity of our model with ANN versions of other models. Receptor neurons of the nonpheromonal, general odor-processing subsystem of the honeybee are broadly tuned, have overlapping response spectra, and show highly nonlinear concentration dependencies and mixture interactions, i.e., synergistic and inhibitory effects. Our full model alone has the necessary complexity to simulate these complex response characteristics. To account for the complex response characteristics of honeybee receptor neurons, we suggest that several different receptor protein types and at least two second messenger systems are necessary that may interact at various levels of the transduction cascade and may eventually have opposing effects on receptor neuron excitability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7548309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.