ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Functional interaction between losartan and central tachykinin NK3 receptors in the conscious rat.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe food restriction activates the central renin angiotensin system.Physiological reports · 2020Article
- Angiotensin II blocks memory consolidation through an AT2 receptor-dependent mechanism.Psychopharmacology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The cardiovascular and behavioural effects elicted by the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA), [MePhe7]neurokinin B ([MePhe7]NKB) or angiotensin II (AII) in the conscious rat were assessed before and 5 min after i.c.v. pretreatment with antagonists selective for angiotensin AT1 (losartan and its active metabolite EXP 3174), angiotensin AT2 (PD 123,319) or tachykinin NK3 (R 486) receptors. 2. I.c.v. administration of 25 pmol AII evoked an increase in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and water intake behaviour, accompanied by a transient bradycardia, whereas 25 pmol [MePhe7]NKB caused a transient increase in MAP and heart rate (HR) concurrently with marked wet dog shake behaviour. At the same dose, SP and NKA were more potent than [MePhe7]NKB in increasing MAP and HR, but did not produce water intake or wet dog shake behaviours. 3. Losartan (650 pmol, i.c.v.) reduced significantly the cardiovascular and behavioural responses to AII or [MePhe7]NKB, but not to SP or NKA. While 65 pmol losartan was inactive, 260 pmol inhibited selectively the central effects of AII. Whereas EXP 3174 (6.5 nmol) blocked both AII and [MePhe7]NKB-mediated responses, the dose of 650 pmol blocked only the responses to AII. 4. The central responses to AII and [MePhe7]NKB were not affected by PD 123,319 (650 pmol). On the other hand, the [MePhe7]NKB-induced central effects were significantly reduced by R 486 (650 pmol). The NK3-selective antagonist had no effect against AII. 5. This study provides functional evidence, to support earlier binding data, that losartan (and to some extent its active metabolite EXP 3174) interact with the tachykinin NK3 receptor in rat brain. However,the cardiovascular and behavioural responses induced by central tachykinin agonists (SP, NKA and[MePhe7]NKB) and All are mediated by unrelated mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.