ArticleThe Histochemical journal1995
Localization of nuclear RNA by pre- and post-embedding in situ hybridization using different gold probes.
Article in The Histochemical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- ISH-IEM: a sensitive method to detect endogenous mRNAs at the ultrastructural level.Nature protocols · 2010Article
- Electron tomography of metaphase nucleolar organizer regions: evidence for a twisted-loop organization.Molecular biology of the cell · 1997Article
- In situ hybridization: methods and applications.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 1997Review
- RNA molecules lighting up under the microscope.Histochemistry and cell biology · 1996Review
- Evaluation of pepsin treatment for electron microscopic RNA in situ hybridization on ultra-thin cryosections of cultured cells.Histochemistry and cell biology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-embedding and post-embedding in situ hybridization techniques were compared for the localization of RNAs in the nucleus. 28S rRNA and transcripts of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-receptor) were localized with both hybridization methods. Pre-embedding hybridizations were performed on cells permeabilized with Triton X-100, whereas post-embedding hybridizations were carried out on Lowicryl K4M sections. From these studies it was concluded that, for labelling of 28S rRNA, the post-embedding in situ hybridization is preferred, whereas EGF-receptor transcripts were successfully detected only after pre-embedding in situ hybridization. Furthermore, the detection of the hybrids with ultra-small gold particles was compared to the detection with 6 nm gold particles in both pre- and post-embedding in situ hybridization studies. From our results it is concluded that the use of ultra-small gold particles results in higher label efficiency. Therefore, ultra-small gold particles are preferable to 6 nm gold particles for the detection of hybrids in high-resolution in situ hybridization experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.