Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7535742›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics1995

Analysis of the complete coding region of the CFTR gene in a cohort of CF patients from north-eastern Italy: identification of 90% of the mutations.

A Bonizzato, L Bisceglia, C Marigo, E Nicolis, C Bombieri, C Castellani, G Borgo, L Zelante, G Mastella, G Cabrini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A BonizzatoCentro Regionale Veneto Fibrosi Cistica, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy.
L Bisceglia
C Marigo
E Nicolis
C Bombieri
C Castellani
G Borgo
L Zelante
G Mastella
G Cabrini
Cystic Fibrosis Research Foundation · ITI.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria SS · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A complete coding-region analysis on 225 cystic fibrosis (CF) chromosomes from a cohort that includes all the affected subjects born in two North-Eastern Italian regions over eight years was performed. In a previous study, we identified mutations on 166/225 (73.8%) CF chromosomes after screening for 62 mutations. To characterise the remaining 59 CF chromosomes, we carried out automated direct DNA sequencing (exons 9 and 13), RNA single-strand conformation polymorphism (exons 1-8 and 10-12) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (exons 14a-24) of the 27 exons and flanking regions of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene. We identified 22 mutations, four of which are novel, viz. 711 + 5G-->A, R709X, 3132delTG and 2790-2A-->G, and we characterised 90.2% (203/225) of the CF chromosomes. Taking advantage of the homogeneity of the sample, an evaluation of the most important clinical parameters, assessed at the age of 12 years, is presented. We confirm some previously reported genotype-phenotype correlations and we report a new nonsense mutation (R709X) associated with a pancreatic sufficient phenotype.

Indexed as

CodonMutationAdolescentAdultBase SequenceChildCohort StudiesCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeHumansItalyMaleCFTR protein, humanCodonCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID7535742
OpenAlexW2034139029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.