Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7532634›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry1994

Effects of antigen retrieval by microwave heating in formalin-fixed tissue sections on a broad panel of antibodies.

R von Wasielewski, M Werner, M Nolte, L Wilkens, A Georgii

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of histopathology in forensic practice: an overview.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Standardised fluorescence in situ hybridisation in cytological and histological specimens.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2005
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tissue preparation for immunocytochemistry.Journal of clinical pathology · 1997
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R von WasielewskiPathologisches Institut der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
M Werner
M Nolte
L Wilkens
A Georgii

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formaldehyde fixation of biopsy specimens for routine purposes has often been held responsible for the poor reproducibility of immunohistochemical studies. Recently, antigen retrieval (AGR) using microwave irradiation was described as a potential tool to enhance immunostaining. A comparison of conventional staining and staining after microwave heating was performed for 52 markers, using tissues fixed in formaldehyde for 24 h, 1 to 6 weeks and 3 years respectively, as well as consultant case material. After adequate duration of fixation (24 h), only a few markers (17%) showed better results after AGR, but this percentage was increased to 50% when tissues were fixed for longer periods. Maximal enhancement was obtained in the group of consultant cases (58% of tested markers demonstrated better staining results), in which the period of fixation and tissue processing was unknown. To achieve reliable enhancement with AGR, continuous heating (100 degrees C) should not be shorter than 20 min. In conclusion, AGR may become the most important tool to simplify and equalize immunohistochemical techniques, if critically evaluated.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalMicrowavesBiomarkersFormaldehydeHumansImmunohistochemistryStaining and LabelingTissue FixationAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkersFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID7532634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.