Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7530630›Full record

ReviewDrugs1994

Filgrastim. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia.

J E Frampton, C R Lee, D Faulds

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in multiple myeloma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J E FramptonAdis International Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
C R Lee
D Faulds

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filgrastim, a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), has identical biological activity to that of endogenous human G-CSF, but differs in that it contains an N-terminal methionine residue and is not glycosylated. It principally stimulates activation, proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil progenitor cells and has been evaluated in the treatment of patients with various neutropenic conditions, both iatrogenic and disease-related. Two comparative studies have demonstrated that prophylactic administration of filgrastim 230 micrograms/m2/day significantly reduces the incidence, duration and severity of neutropenia in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer receiving standard-dose chemotherapy with CDE (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin plus etoposide). Concomitant with the amelioration of neutropenia, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was significantly reduced by 50% and there were 35 and 50% decreases in hospitalisation rates and intravenous antibiotic requirements. Since not all patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy are at risk of infectious complications, prophylactic filgrastim use may be reserved for those patients who have developed febrile neutropenia during a previous cycle of the same regimen. This strategy may prove less costly, although potential savings must be weighed against a greater risk of patient morbidity and reduced quality of life. When combined with standard intravenous antibiotic therapy, filgrastim further decreases morbidity in patients with established febrile neutropenia and may have a positive impact on overall treatment costs by shortening the length of hospitalisation. Attention is focused on the use of haematopoietic growth factors to support dose-intensification of chemotherapy with a view to improving treatment outcomes in patients with chemo-responsive tumours. Filgrastim, used alone, permits modest increases in dose-intensity and/or dose-escalation of some standard-dose chemotherapy regimens. Moreover, the drug has proven useful as an adjunct to myeloablative chemotherapy followed by stem cell rescue with autologous bone marrow transplantation and/or peripheral blood progenitor cells. However, the impact of these dose-intensification approaches on survival remains to be determined in well-controlled clinical studies. Filgrastim is effective in increasing the neutrophil count and decreasing morbidity in patients with severe chronic neutropenia, including Kostmann's syndrome, and in idiopathic and cyclic neutropenia. In addition, filgrastim has accelerated neutrophil recovery in patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis. Available data indicate that filgrastim is generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse reaction is mild to moderate medullary bone pain, reported by approximately 20% of patients, although this can generally be controlled using simple analgesics without the need to discontinue treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Indexed as

AnimalsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansNeutropeniaRecombinant ProteinsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID7530630
OpenAlexW1966963151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.