Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7526519›Full record

ArticleUrological research1994

Culture and characterisation of human urothelium in vivo and in vitro.

J L Petzoldt, I M Leigh, P G Duffy, J R Masters

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urological research, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: A Mystery in Search of Better Model Systems.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cultured urothelium in sheep bladder augmentation.Pediatric surgery international · 1996
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J L PetzoldtInstitute of Urology and Nephrology, Research Laboratories, London, UK.
I M Leigh
P G Duffy
J R Masters
Royal London Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to culture human urothelium and generate enough cells for subsequent reconstructive surgery. Using a modification of the Rheinwald-Green method for the routine culture of keratinocytes from patients with burns, we successfully cultured 91% of 57 biopsies from the renal pelvis, ureter, bladder and urethra of paediatric patients. The cells could be split one to three up to 9 times at 7-10 day intervals, giving a surface area of 1000 cm2 after a 2 month culture period. Primary cultures could not be initiated in defined medium MCDB153, although cells initiated using the Rheinwald-Green method could subsequently be propagated in this medium. Cytokeratin patterns in vitro were similar to those in vivo in the expression of keratins 7, 18 and 19 (characteristic of simple epithelia) and keratin 13 (characteristic of non-cornified stratified epithelia). Cultured urothelium also expressed keratin 14 (characteristic of cornified stratified epithelium) in about 25% of cells and keratin 16 (characteristic of fast-growing cells). These findings indicate that urothelial cells can be propagated in vitro for autologous grafting, and the next step is to identify substrates suitable for urothelial cell growth and differentiation and surgical manipulation.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedChildCulture MediaCulture TechniquesEpithelial CellsHumansKeratinsUrinary TractCulture MediaKeratins

Identifiers

PMID7526519
OpenAlexW2017903205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.