ReviewDrugs1994
Ceftibuten. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.
Review in Drugs, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single- and multiple-dose study of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral ceftibuten in healthy adult subjects.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Trial
- Randomised trial of oral versus sequential intravenous/oral cephalosporins in children with pyelonephritis.European journal of pediatrics · 2008Trial
- Interpretation of middle ear fluid concentrations of antibiotics: comparison between ceftibuten, cefixime and azithromycin.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 1999Trial
- Clinical Evidence in Respiratory and Urinary Tract Infections: Focus on Ceftibuten.Pharmacology · 2026Review
- Subtractive genomics and drug repurposing strategies for targetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- ARGONAUT-IV: susceptibility of carbapenemase-producingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Determination of MIC Quality Control Ranges for Ceftibuten-Avibactam (Fixed 4 μg/mL), a Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against a global collection of Enterobacterales from patients with urinary tract infections (2021).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023Article
- Crystal structures of anhydrous and hydrated ceftibuten.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2022Article
- Ceftibuten concentrations in human tonsillar tissue.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1996Article
- Rational prescribing of antibacterials in ambulatory children.PharmacoEconomics · 1996Review
- Ceftibuten in paediatrics.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceftibuten is an orally active third generation cephalosporin which has a broad spectrum of in vitro antibacterial activity, encompassing the majority of Gram-negative pathogens and streptococci, and which shows greater stability than several other cephalosporins against bacteria producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. In clinical studies, ceftibuten (generally 400 mg/day in adults or 9 mg/kg/day in children, administered once daily) was effective in the treatment of acute uncomplicated or complicated urinary tract infections, demonstrating an efficacy similar to that of cefaclor (1500 mg/day), and similar or superior to that of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; 8/40 mg/kg/day) in children. The majority of patients with acute or chronic lower respiratory tract infections responded to treatment with ceftibuten, and response rates were similar to those achieved with cefaclor (750 or 1500 mg/day). Ceftibuten 9 mg/kg/day was at least as effective as cefaclor and as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (both 40 mg/kg/day) in children with acute otitis media, and was superior to phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V; 25 mg/kg/day) in children and adolescents with streptococcal pharyngitis or scarlet fever caused by Group A beta-haemolytic streptococci. Ceftibuten was well tolerated in most patients, with adverse events (mostly mild to moderate gastrointestinal disturbances) generally occurring in 5 to 10% of patients. Thus, ceftibuten, with a once- or twice-daily oral dosage regimen, good tolerability profile and activity against a wide range of bacterial organisms, offers a promising alternative to other agents (including cefaclor, cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, bacampicillin and phenoxymethylpenicillin) for the treatment of patients with urogenital and respiratory tract infections. Its place in therapy will be more clearly defined following further large comparative trials, in which it is likely to prove most useful in patients with infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.