Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7517831›Full record

ReviewDrugs1994

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy, coronary heart disease and plasma lipoproteins.

M Seed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Doctor, should I take hormones?The Permanente journal · 2005
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M SeedDepartment of Medicine, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London, England.
Charing Cross Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review outlines the changes in serum lipoprotein (Lp) concentrations at the menopause. The effect of hormone replacement therapy with estrogen and a variety of progestogens is illustrated by a number of recent studies. Analysis of the effects of estrogen replacement in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) is discussed. During the last 4 years, there have been 4 observational studies of the use of estrogen in postmenopausal women with CHD as assessed by coronary angiography. In all of these studies, estrogen has been associated with a reduction in CHD, most strikingly in a study of survival over 10 years. However, there is an overwhelming need for a randomised controlled trial of estrogen for secondary prevention. The role of estrogen in the treatment of type II hyperlipoproteinaemia has been recognised, and a study describing its effect is discussed. Again, there is need for data from well controlled clinical trials to clearly establish the benefits of estrogen therapy. A further aspect for investigation is a study of the non-lipoprotein-mediated effects of estrogen, particularly those on vasomotion. Finally, the intriguing effects of both androgenic and estrogenic steroids on Lp(a) are discussed.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyAdultAgedCholesterol, HDLCoronary DiseaseFemaleHumansLipoprotein(a)LipoproteinsMenopauseMiddle AgedCholesterol, HDLLipoprotein(a)Lipoproteins

Identifiers

PMID7517831
OpenAlexW2058350398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.