Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7511317›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica1994

Tomaculous neuropathy in chromosome 1 Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome.

F P Thomas, R V Lebo, G Rosoklija, X S Ding, R E Lovelace, N Latov, A P Hays

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immune deficiency in mouse models for inherited peripheral neuropathies leads to improved myelin maintenance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2000
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Heterozygous peripheral myelin protein 22-deficient mice are affected by a progressive demyelinating tomaculous neuropathy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1997
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F P ThomasDepartment of Pathology (Division of Neuropathology), College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
R V Lebo
G Rosoklija
X S Ding
R E Lovelace
N Latov
A P Hays
Columbia University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CHARCOT-MARIE TOOTH SYNDROMER01NS025541 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEBO, ROGER V · 1988 to 1990
–
NINDS NIH HHS NINCDS NS11761NINDS NIH HHS NINCDS NS25541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed morphological and immunohistochemical studies on sural nerve biopsies from two members of a Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1B family, in which a mutation of the P0 gene on chromosome 1 had been found. Biopsies showed a tomaculous neuropathy with loss of myelinated fibers and frequent small onion bulbs. Immunofluorescence with antibodies to P0 showed this protein to be present in tomaculous and non-tomaculous areas of the myelin sheath. The severity of the myelin abnormalities suggests that in this family Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease may result from a generalized disturbance of Schwann cells as a result of an abnormal P0 protein.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1BiopsyCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMyelin P0 ProteinMyelin ProteinsMyelin SheathSchwann CellsSural NerveCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalMyelin P0 ProteinMyelin Proteins

Identifiers

PMID7511317
OpenAlexW2030573279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.