Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7508363›Full record

ArticleChromosoma1993

The development of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for the mouse and their application to chromosome painting.

J W Breneman, M J Ramsey, D A Lee, G G Eveleth, J L Minkler, J D Tucker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Paternally inherited chromosomal structural aberrations detected in mouse first-cleavage zygote metaphases by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1996
    Article
  5. Construction of chromosome-specific DNA libraries covering the whole genome of field bean (Vicia faba L.).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1996
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mouse chromosome-specific painting probes generated from microdissected chromosomes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1995
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J W BrenemanBiology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551-9900.
M J Ramsey
D A Lee
G G Eveleth
J L Minkler
J D Tucker
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS CA55861-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The speed and ease of human cytogenetic analysis has been greatly enhanced by the technique of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Non-radioactive fluorescently tagged complex DNA probes specific for individual chromosomes can be hybridized to conventionally obtained metaphase chromosome spreads. Several chromosomes may be "painted" concurrently by using combinations of different labeled probes. Surveys of chromosome breakage and rearrangement may be performed very quickly by avoiding the time consuming process of GTG-banding. The application of FISH to mouse cytogenetics would allow large scale molecular toxicology studies to be conducted on the effects of such environmental insults as potential carcinogens, mutagens and radiation. Progress has been hampered, however, as the Mus musculus karyotype consists of 40 acrocentric chromosomes of approximately the same size, making the recognition and separation of individual chromosomes very difficult. We now describe the successful production and application of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for M. musculus chromosomes 2 and 8. Stable Robertsonian translocated chromosomes were isolated on a flow sorter and their DNA subsequently amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide primer (DOP) PCR. Small pools (300 copies) of each chromosome were denatured at 94 degrees C then annealed with the primer at 30 degrees C for 15 cycles. This was followed by 20 cycles at an annealing temperature of 62 degrees C. Additional amplification was performed at an annealing temperature of 62 degrees C. The chromosome-specific DNA was labeled with biotin 11-dUTP by nick translation and used for FISH. The usefulness of the technique for translocation detection is demonstrated by analyzing chromosome exchanges induced in mice irradiated with 137Cs gamma rays.

Indexed as

ChromosomesDNA ProbesAnimalsBase SequenceBisbenzimidazoleCells, CulturedChromomycin A3DNADNA DamageFemaleFlow CytometryGamma RaysIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMiceMolecular Sequence DataBisbenzimidazoleChromomycin A3DNADNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID7508363
OpenAlexW2095126923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.