Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7507035›Full record

ReviewDrugs1993

Clinical pharmacology of asthma. Implications for treatment.

A J Frew, S T Holgate

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-dose corticosteroids for the management of dyspnea in patients with tumor obstruction of the upper airway.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A J FrewUniversity Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, England.
S T Holgate
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past 10 years have seen three important changes in the philosophy of managing asthma. First, histological studies using fibreoptic bronchoscopy have led to the recognition that asthma is an inflammatory condition of the bronchial mucosa and is not simply caused by smooth muscle spasm. Secondly, there has been some disenchantment with the long term use of regular beta 2-adrenergic agonists as these agents do not appear to control bronchial inflammation and have been associated with deaths from asthma. Thirdly, there has been a general shift away from physician-centred management towards patient-oriented management plans. These three separate strands have led to the development of regional and international consensus documents that emphasise the use of regular anti-inflammatory treatment to control bronchial inflammation and reduce symptoms. With the emphasis on finding the minimum amount of treatment, several traditional anti-asthma medications have been downgraded in importance. The introduction of self-management plans is to be welcomed, but it is important that these new strategies for treating asthma are properly evaluated so that the benefits they confer can be ascertained and maximised.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsHumansAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID7507035
OpenAlexW2066502838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.